I tried the dissect this drama and I doubt there will be more in the future. I don't blame you for thinking this is illegal but at the same time I understand where people are coming from when they say they think these leaks are okay. There is even whole articles about the morality of this leak. There and valid excuses the people could make up with this type of stuff. This was stolen so you could consider it illegal but If you copy it pixel by pixel like I said I could technically recreate it. The whole legality depends on your whole moral view. Whatever If people really want these models there are tools that came with the leak that can convert the sou files to ply, I am not giving the links because I don't want nintendo coming after me. So wouldn't the yoshi sprites technically be an exception but everything else is illegal. What I'm saying is that The beta yoshi sprites are up in the custom section because we got a picture of the sprites on a computer taken by Nintendo. And people recreated the sprites and we got the actual beta sprites in the leak, so would recreating the sprites pixel by pixel Technically be legal. And then we got sprites of beta yoshi, however a couple years ago we got a picture of beta sprites of yoshi. The preservation project is a recreation of the spaceworld 95 demo of the game and with the Actual beta mario from the leak, the only difference between that and the final game is that his hair is lower poly, and the beta mario model from the preservation project looks exactly the same but was made before the leaks. What is the situation regarding recreated models or sprites that are almost identical to the leaked assets but didn't come from the leaks. I guess you can ban the leaked models if its for the good of this website The personal information of the employees is wrong but the assets of the models and sprites is where it is confusing.
0 kommentar(er)
